A-Level Classical Civilisation · The Odyssey · Topic 1 · Lesson 4

The Gods, Fate and Responsibility

How the gods act in the poem, and whether that excuses anyone.

Book 1 · prescribed Books 2–4 · context
← The Odyssey Lesson 4 · The gods Topic Tester
Start here
Lesson 4 · The gods

The Odyssey opens on Olympus, with the gods discussing the fate of mortals. Gods intervene in the poem directly and often, and yet from the very first speech the poem insists that mortals remain accountable for their own choices. This lesson asks how the gods act, what fate allows, and whether divine involvement ever excuses anyone.

What you need to know
  • who counts as a god, and how gods differ from one another in power and reach
  • the ways gods act in mortal affairs: openly, in disguise, through signs, through favour and grudges
  • what moira, atē, hybris and nemesis mean, and how fate limits even the gods
  • why divine involvement never cancels human responsibility in this poem

Where it happens in Book 1

1.22 Poseidon away with the Ethiopians   1.26–41 Zeus on Aegisthus   1.37–43 Hermes’s warning   1.60–79 Poseidon’s grudge explained   1.96–105 Athene as Mentes   1.178–212 the conversation with Telemachus   1.272–279 the departure as a bird

Have your Book 1 workbook open alongside this page. Quotations on this page give the workbook’s own line numbers.

Who counts as a god
Section 1

Greek religion has a huge cast. At the top sit the major Olympian gods, among them Zeus, Poseidon, Athene and Hermes, who rule over broad areas of life and hold real authority over each other and over mortals. Below them is a vast range of minor divine beings, such as nymphs, river-gods and local spirits, each with a far smaller sphere.

Calypso is a useful test case. She is genuinely divine, a nymph with real power: she can keep Odysseus on her island for seven years and offer him immortality. However, she is not an Olympian. She has no seat on Olympus, no authority over other gods and no say in the council that opens the poem. She counts as a god, but a minor one.

Greek gods are anthropomorphic. They look like exceptionally beautiful humans, feel real emotions, hold grudges, play favourites and argue, exactly like the mortals in the poem, except that they are immortal and vastly more powerful. This is worth stating plainly, because it is what allows a god like Poseidon to be genuinely petty without any contradiction. Pettiness is a human trait which the gods share on a larger scale.

Who’s who in this topic

GodWho they are and what they do in Books 1–4
ZeusKing of the gods. He delivers the poem’s opening statement on human responsibility and confirms Odysseus’s fated return.
AtheneZeus’s daughter, goddess of wisdom and strategy, and Odysseus’s patron. She acts through disguise throughout Books 1–4.
PoseidonZeus’s brother and god of the sea. He holds a personal grudge against Odysseus for blinding his son Polyphemus.
HermesThe messenger god. He carried Zeus’s warning to Aegisthus.
Calypso, ProteusMinor sea divinities. Neither is an Olympian.
The core vocabulary
Section 2

Five terms do most of the work in any answer on the gods. Learn them precisely, because each has a meaning that is easy to blur.

The words
moira
a person’s allotted portion or fate, above all the span and manner of their life and death. Even the gods generally act within it
atē
ruinous folly or blind delusion: the state of mind that leads to a catastrophic decision. It is often said to be sent by a god, yet the person acting under it is still held responsible
hybris
dangerous overreach: arrogance that oversteps the limits proper to a mortal, a guest or a weaker party
nemesis
the righteous anger or retribution that follows hybris, understood as deserved and not arbitrary
double motivation
the same act given both a divine and a human cause at once, without either cancelling the other

Common mistake. Never write that a character “had no choice” because a god was involved. In almost every case in this topic the poem holds the human responsible alongside the divine explanation.

How the gods act
Section 3

The Odyssey runs two explanatory systems side by side. Gods intervene directly and often, and at the same time the poem insists that mortals remain accountable for their choices. The two systems usually describe the same action from two angles, so that a single event can have a divine and a human explanation at once.

Four ways the gods act in Books 1–4

  1. Directly. A god appears, speaks or physically alters a situation. This is the most straightforward form, and the rarest in the Telemachy.
  2. In disguise. A god takes a mortal form to influence events without revealing themselves. Athene as Mentes and as Mentor is the clearest example in this topic.
  3. Through signs. Bird omens, dreams and portents need a skilled interpreter and leave room for disagreement. The suitors and Halitherses read the same eagle omen in Book 2 in opposite ways.
  4. Through favour and grudges. Gods form lasting attachments for and against particular mortals. Athene’s patronage of Odysseus’s family and Poseidon’s grudge against Odysseus both run across the whole poem.
Fate
Section 4

Moira means portion or share: the allotted span and shape of a life, including its ending. It is less a detailed script than a kind of cosmic accounting, the share that belongs to each person and cannot simply be handed to someone else. In Homer moira is usually a single, barely personified force, and its meaning is close to that of the related word aisa.

Common mistake. The familiar image of three named goddesses of fate, Clotho who spins the thread of life, Lachesis who measures it and Atropos who cuts it, belongs chiefly to the later poet Hesiod and does not appear in the Odyssey.

Fate as a limit on the gods

Fate works as a boundary on divine power. The gods can shape how and when something happens, but they cannot ordinarily decide whether it happens at all. Poseidon shows this precisely: Odysseus is fated to return, so Poseidon can only delay the homecoming and make it painful, and he has no power to cancel it.

Even Zeus’s relationship to fate is not entirely passive. In the Iliad he weighs two heroes’ lots of death on a golden scale, which is the image of a god who administers fate as well as obeying it. His confirmation of Odysseus’s return in Book 1 fits the same pattern, since in it Zeus actively guarantees an outcome that fate has already set.

Prophecy in the poem therefore reveals fixed outcomes. What stays open is the path, the suffering along the way, and the choices that mortals make.

Responsibility
Section 5

Zeus opens the poem with what amounts to a manifesto for the whole work: mortals blame the gods too readily for suffering which is really the result of their own transgressions. 1.26–41

The case of Aegisthus

Zeus proves his point at once with Aegisthus, who was explicitly warned by Hermes not to murder Agamemnon or marry his wife, did both anyway, and was killed by Orestes. Every element of the case is designed to make the point: a prior warning, a free choice and a deserved consequence.

Remember. Hermes matters here more than students expect. Without a specific, delivered warning, Aegisthus could claim ignorance. The warning is what makes the example a fair test of Aegisthus, where otherwise it would be a trap.

Atē, hybris and nemesis

Atē fits the same logic. Even where a god is said to send the ruinous folly, the poem does not treat that as removing responsibility. Atē explains why the choice felt inevitable, and the person under it still made the choice.

Hybris and nemesis frame the suitors. Eating Telemachus’s livestock for three years without permission is overreach, committed in the confident assumption that no consequence will ever arrive. The eagle omen in Book 2 is nemesis being signalled in advance.

The gods in Book 1
Section 6 · Prescribed text

Book 1 opens on Olympus and only then moves to Ithaca. The divine council is the main scene for this topic: it sets out the poem’s theology, explains why Odysseus is still away, and launches Athene’s plan. Athene’s visit to Telemachus then shows a god at work among mortals.

The scenes in order

Scene 1
Poseidon away
Workbook lines 11–30

Odysseus is held by Calypso; every god pities him except Poseidon, who is away feasting with the Ethiopians while the others meet.

Scene 2
Zeus speaks
Workbook lines 31–42

Zeus complains that mortals blame the gods for their own transgressions, and gives Aegisthus as the proof.

Scene 3
The grudge explained
Workbook lines 43–73

Athene raises Odysseus’s case. Zeus explains Poseidon’s anger over Polyphemus and says the gods will bring Odysseus home.

Scene 4
Athene’s plan
Workbook lines 74–86

Hermes will go to Calypso, and Athene will go to Ithaca to encourage Telemachus to act.

Scene 5
Athene as Mentes
Workbook lines 87–96, 172–181

Athene arrives in the form of a family friend and tells Telemachus that his father is alive.

Scene 6
The departure
Workbook lines 278–283

Athene vanishes like a bird. Telemachus realises a god has been with him, and returns to the suitors changed.

Scene 1 · Poseidon away

Not even when the rolling seasons brought in the year which the gods had chosen for his homecoming to Ithaca was he clear of his troubles and safe among his friends. Yet all the gods pitied him, except Poseidon, who pursued the heroic Odysseus with relentless malice till the day when he reached his own country. Poseidon, however, was now gone on a visit to the distant Ethiopians … He had gone to accept a sacrifice of bulls and rams, and there he sat and enjoyed the pleasures of the feast.

Book 1, workbook lines 15–25

Unpacking the passage

“the year which the gods had chosen for his homecoming”
The return is already fixed. The narrator presents Odysseus’s homecoming as a settled part of his fate before any god has spoken.
“except Poseidon, who pursued the heroic Odysseus with relentless malice”
Poseidon’s attitude is personal hostility, and it sets him against the rest of the gods.
“till the day when he reached his own country”
The grudge has an end point. The narrator tells us in advance that Odysseus will reach home, so Poseidon can delay him but cannot stop him.
“enjoyed the pleasures of the feast”
Poseidon is conveniently absent. This lets the other gods act on Odysseus’s behalf without opposing him directly.

The opening lines therefore place fate and a divine grudge side by side: the outcome is settled, while a single god makes the path to it as hard as he can.

Scene 2 · Zeus speaks

‘What a lamentable thing it is that men should blame the gods and regard us, as the source of their troubles, when it is their own transgressions which bring them suffering that was not their destiny. Consider Aegisthus: it was not his destiny to steal Agamemnon’s wife and murder her husband when he came home. He knew the result would be utter disaster, since we ourselves had sent Hermes, the keen-eyed Giant-slayer, to warn him neither to kill the man nor to court his wife. … Yet with all his friendly counsel Hermes failed to dissuade him. And now Aegisthus has paid the final price for all his sins.’

Book 1, workbook lines 31–42

Unpacking the passage

“men should blame the gods”
Zeus begins with a complaint about mortals. The first words spoken by any character in the poem are about who is to blame for suffering.
“their own transgressions which bring them suffering that was not their destiny”
Some suffering lies outside a person’s moira and is added by their own wrongdoing. Fate does not account for everything that happens to a mortal.
“we ourselves had sent Hermes”
The gods gave Aegisthus a specific warning. He cannot claim that he did not know what would follow.
“has paid the final price for all his sins”
His death is presented as a deserved consequence. This is nemesis following hybris.

Every element of the case, the warning, the free choice and the deserved death, supports Zeus’s principle. The speech also sets up a parallel for the rest of the poem: the suitors, too, will be warned, and will choose to ignore it.

Scene 3 · The grudge explained

‘Nonsense, my child!’ replied the Gatherer of the Clouds. ‘How could I ever forget the admirable Odysseus? He is not only the wisest man alive but has been the most generous in his offerings to the immortals who live in the wide heaven. It is Poseidon, Sustainer of the Earth, who is so implacable towards him on account of the Cyclops, godlike Polyphemus, the most powerful of the Cyclopes, whom Odysseus blinded. … That is why, ever since Polyphemus was blinded, Poseidon the Earth-shaker has kept Odysseus in exile, though he stops short of killing him.’

Book 1, workbook lines 59–70

Unpacking the passage

“the most generous in his offerings to the immortals”
Odysseus has honoured the gods properly. He is being detained by Calypso, and Zeus does not suggest that he is being punished for wrongdoing.
“on account of the Cyclops … whom Odysseus blinded”
Poseidon’s anger is a father’s anger on behalf of his son. Zeus presents it as a personal grudge.
“stops short of killing him”
Poseidon can keep Odysseus in exile but does not kill him. His power works within the limit set by Odysseus’s fated return.

Zeus ends by proposing that the gods “contrive a plan to bring him home”, adding that Poseidon “will not be able to struggle on alone against the united will of the immortal gods” (workbook lines 70–73). Athene had opened this exchange by asking why Zeus was “at odds” with Odysseus (workbook line 58). Zeus’s answer separates Poseidon’s personal anger from the judgement of the gods as a whole.

Scene 4 · Athene’s plan

‘… if it is now the pleasure of the blessed gods that the wise Odysseus shall return to Ithaca, let us send our Messenger, Hermes the Giant-killer, to the isle of Ogygia, so that he can immediately tell Calypso, the Nymph with the plaited tresses, of our unalterable decision that the patient Odysseus must now set out for home. Meanwhile I myself will go to Ithaca to instil more spirit into Odysseus’ son and encourage him to call the long-haired Achaeans to an assembly … After that I shall send him to Sparta and to sandy Pylos to seek news of his father’s return.’

Book 1, workbook lines 75–85

Unpacking the passage

“our unalterable decision”
The gods present Odysseus’s return as guaranteed. This is Zeus and the council confirming the outcome that fate has already set.
“to instil more spirit into Odysseus’ son”
Athene plans to add to the courage Telemachus already has. She means to strengthen him for action.
“encourage him to call … an assembly”
The verb is “encourage”. Telemachus will still have to call the assembly himself, so the decision remains his.

The plan shows divine help planned from the start to work through a mortal’s own actions. Athene proposes to go in disguise and encourage Telemachus, which leaves him responsible for what he does next.

Scene 5 · Athene as Mentes

She flashed down from the heights of Olympus, and on reaching Ithaca she took her stand on the threshold of the court in front of Odysseus’ house; and to look like a visitor she assumed the appearance of a family friend, the Taphian chieftain Mentes, bronze spear in hand.

‘… Now I am no seer or soothsayer, but I will venture on a prophecy to you which the immortal gods put into my mind. I am certain it will come true. Your father will not be exiled much longer from the land he loves so well, not even if he’s kept in iron chains.’

Book 1, workbook lines 92–96 and 177–180

Unpacking the passage

“to look like a visitor she assumed the appearance of a family friend”
Athene chooses disguise. She intervenes on behalf of a favoured family indirectly, without revealing herself.
“a prophecy … which the immortal gods put into my mind”
The audience knows the speaker is herself a goddess. Telemachus hears it as the word of a mortal friend with a sense of the gods’ intentions.
“I am certain it will come true”
The prophecy reveals a fixed outcome: Odysseus will come home. It says nothing about how, which is left open.

This is patronage in action. The disguise also keeps Telemachus responsible: Athene supplies information and advice, and he still has to decide to act on it. She ends her advice by saying, “I leave the matter in your hands. Think over what I have said” (workbook lines 265–266).

Scene 6 · The departure

The goddess spoke and the next moment she was gone, vanishing like a bird through a hole in the roof. In Telemachus’ heart she had implanted spirit and daring, and had brought the image of his father to his mind even more strongly than before. He felt the change and was overcome with awe, for he realized a god had been with him. Then, godlike himself, he rejoined the Suitors.

Book 1, workbook lines 278–283

Unpacking the passage

“vanishing like a bird”
The manner of her leaving is the sign that the visitor was divine.
“she had implanted spirit and daring”
The poem gives Telemachus’s new courage a divine cause.
“He felt the change … he realized a god had been with him”
Telemachus is aware of what has happened to him. He understands that a god has taken an interest in him.
“godlike himself, he rejoined the Suitors”
The scene turns straight back to Telemachus’s own actions among the suitors.

His behaviour changes at once. He speaks to his mother and to the suitors with a confidence he did not have before, telling Penelope that “I am master in this house” (workbook line 314) and announcing to the suitors that he will call an assembly (workbook lines 322–332). Divine help and human choice operate together in the same scene, which is double motivation in action.

What Book 1 establishes

  • Odysseus’s return is fated and confirmed by Zeus, while Poseidon’s grudge can only delay it.
  • Zeus states the principle that mortals suffer through their own transgressions, and Aegisthus is the proof.
  • Athene helps Telemachus through disguise and advice, which leaves him responsible for acting on it.
The gods in Books 2–4
Section 7 · Context

Book 2

  • Two eagles fight overhead. Halitherses reads the omen as a sign of Odysseus’s return and the suitors’ ruin, and the suitors dismiss it. The poem gives one sign two readings and lets the audience see which is right.
  • Athene, now disguised as Mentor, helps Telemachus prepare his ship in secret. Her patronage is consistent and continues well beyond a single appearance.

Book 3

  • Nestor’s grand sacrifice to Poseidon shows a mortal actively maintaining good standing with a god. Correct religious behaviour works as insurance against divine anger.
  • Athene reveals herself, leaving as a bird in front of the court. Nestor recognises a god and orders a sacrifice.

Book 4

  • Menelaus obtains knowledge of fate and of the dead only by physically wrestling Proteus through his transformations. Divine knowledge here has to be earned through struggle.
  • Proteus reveals that Menelaus is destined for Elysium and will escape ordinary death, because he is married to Helen, daughter of Zeus. This is an exception to the normal rule: a fate altered by family connection to the gods, without any question of merit.
  • Athene comforts the grieving Penelope with a dream in the shape of her sister Iphthime. This intervention aims at emotional relief and changes no events, a gentler register of patronage.
Reading the gods critically
Section 8

A fair account should acknowledge a real tension. The gods are shown as personally motivated and sometimes petty, as Poseidon is, and yet the poem also insists on a coherent moral order in which mortals are justly held responsible. Whether these two pictures sit together comfortably is a genuinely debated question.

A stronger reading also notices who delivers the manifesto. Zeus’s speech conveniently shifts blame away from the gods, and it is spoken by the king of the gods himself. Whether the poem intends that irony or simply presents Zeus’s view as correct is worth weighing in an essay, and you should not assume either answer.

Worth noticing. The two sides of this tension appear in the same council. Zeus states a moral principle about Aegisthus, and a few lines later explains that Poseidon is keeping Odysseus in exile out of anger over his son.

Scholarly views to argue with
Section 9

These are positions for you to test against the text. Decide how far the text supports each one, and mark your verdict.

E. R. Dodds
The Greeks and the Irrational (1951)
Homeric characters can describe an act as divinely caused, through atē, and still be held fully responsible for it. Divine and human motivation are two layers of one event, and they do not compete.
For
Zeus blames Aegisthus even though Aegisthus acted under folly; the suitors are both doomed by fate and guilty by choice; Telemachus is helped by Athene and still praised for acting.
Against
If a god genuinely sends the folly, in what sense is the choice free? Dodds describes the poem’s attitude without resolving the contradiction, and you may think the poem does not resolve it either.
How far does the text support this?
Hugh Lloyd-Jones
The Justice of Zeus (1971)
Homer’s Zeus upholds a real moral order. Suffering in the poems is usually deserved, and Zeus’s speech in Book 1 states a genuine theology which he means seriously.
For
Aegisthus was warned and chose; the suitors are warned by omen and by Telemachus and choose; Orestes’s revenge is presented as just. The poem’s plot punishes exactly the people its theology says deserve it.
Against
Poseidon’s grudge is personal and has nothing to do with morality, and Menelaus reaches Elysium through marriage without any merit of his own. The gods’ favouritism sits awkwardly beside claims of justice, and Zeus has an interest in shifting the blame.
How far does the text support this?
Jasper Griffin
Homer on Life and Death (1980)
The gods are an audience. Their ease and immortality exist to set off the seriousness of mortal life: because they cannot die, the poem’s real weight falls on the humans who can.
For
The council opens the poem watching Odysseus’s struggle from above; Poseidon feasts while Odysseus weeps; the gods’ concerns look small next to a household falling apart.
Against
Athene is an active participant. She disguises herself, plans, and drives the entire Telemachy. In this poem at least one god takes part in events, which complicates the picture of divine detachment.
How far does the text support this?
Summary
Lesson 4 · The gods
Key points
  • The gods are not one flat category. The Olympians rule, while minor divinities such as Calypso and Proteus have only local power. All of them are anthropomorphic, which is why they can be petty.
  • Moira is a boundary which even the gods respect: Poseidon can delay Odysseus’s return but cannot prevent it. Homer’s moira is a single force, and the three named Fates come from Hesiod.
  • The gods act in four main ways: directly, in disguise, through signs, and through favour and grudges.
  • In his opening speech Zeus says that mortals suffer through their own transgressions 1.26–41. Aegisthus proves the point: he was warned by Hermes, chose to act anyway and was punished. Atē explains such a choice without excusing it.
  • In Book 1 the council meets while Poseidon is absent, Zeus explains Poseidon’s grudge 1.60–79, Athene visits Telemachus disguised as Mentes, and she leaves as a bird, after which Telemachus behaves with new confidence.
  • In Books 2–4 the eagle omen is read in two ways, Nestor sacrifices to Poseidon, Athene reveals herself at Pylos, Menelaus wrestles Proteus for knowledge and learns that he is destined for Elysium, and Athene sends Penelope a comforting dream.
  • Dodds argues for double motivation, Lloyd-Jones for a just Zeus and Griffin for the gods as an audience. Each view can be tested against Poseidon’s pettiness, Menelaus’s unearned Elysium and Athene’s active role.
Can you…?
Flashcards
Click a card to turn it over
Click to reveal