Tacitus - Annals 14.9: Burial and Prophecy
Passage Analysis
What Happens
Tacitus opens with historiographical honesty: most sources agree on the murder, but disagree on whether Nero viewed and praised his mother's corpse—some say yes, others no. The cremation happens immediately, that same night, on a dining couch (not a proper funeral bier) with cheap, rushed rites. No proper burial follows: no earth heaped up, no sealed tomb—deliberate erasure while Nero rules. Only later do loyal servants secretly raise a modest mound near Misenum, by Julius Caesar's old villa overlooking the bay—a location both symbolic (Caesar's property) and practical (high visibility). At the pyre, freedman Mnester kills himself—whether from grief or fear remains unclear. Tacitus then reveals the prophecy: years earlier, Chaldaean astrologers told Agrippina that Nero would rule and kill her. Her chilling response: "Let him kill, as long as he becomes emperor." This retrospective prophecy frames the entire narrative—she knew her fate and accepted it for power.
Key Themes & Ideas
- Historical Uncertainty: Even ancient sources disagreed on details—did Nero view the body or not?
- Deliberate Dishonour: Dining couch instead of funeral bier, cheap rites, no proper burial—calculated insult.
- Memory Erasure: Nero attempts to delete her from history by denying proper burial.
- Loyal Resistance: Servants risk punishment to give her minimal honour—loyalty survives death.
- Prophetic Fulfilment: The Chaldaean prophecy comes true—power achieved through matricide.
- Maternal Ambition: "Let him kill, as long as he rules"—power matters more than life.
Tacitean Technique
- Source Citation: "Sunt qui tradiderint, sunt qui abnuant" shows historiographical scrupulousness.
- Parallel Structure: Balanced phrases for conflicting accounts maintain neutrality.
- Degrading Details: "Convivali lecto" and "exequiis vilibus" emphasise dishonour through specific items.
- Temporal Markers: "Nocte eadem," "mox" show rushed disposal then delayed honour.
- Geographic Symbolism: Caesar's villa location links Agrippina to earlier power.
- Direct Speech Climax: Her actual words "occidat...dum imperet" provide shocking conclusion.
Historical Context
Roman funeral customs required proper rites—cremation on a formal funeral bed (not dining couch), appropriate ceremonies, and burial with earth properly heaped and sealed. Denying these was extreme dishonour. The location near Misenum was significant: Julius Caesar's villa represented old Republican power, contrasting with Nero's corrupted principate. Chaldaean astrologers were Babylonian practitioners highly regarded in Rome despite periodic expulsions—their prophecies were taken seriously. Freedmen like Mnester often had deep loyalty to patrons, making his suicide ambiguous—genuine grief or fear of torture? The immediate cremation prevented proper preparation of the body and formal lying in state. The servants' later action required courage—honouring Agrippina could be seen as opposing Nero. The prophecy story may be retrospective invention, but captures Agrippina's character perfectly—accepting death as the price of power.
Questions to Consider
- Why does Tacitus include conflicting accounts about Nero viewing the body—what does this uncertainty achieve?
- How does the contrast between immediate dishonour and eventual modest honour reflect on Nero's power?
- What is the significance of the burial location near Julius Caesar's villa?
- Is Mnester's suicide loyalty or self-preservation—and why leave it ambiguous?
- How does the prophecy reframe the entire narrative—was this always destiny?
- What does "Let him kill, as long as he rules" reveal about Roman attitudes to power versus family?