Tacitus - Annals 14.7: Nero's Panic and Final Plot
Passage Analysis
What Happens
Nero receives the catastrophic news: Agrippina lives, wounded but alive, and certainly knows who tried to kill her. Panic overwhelms him—he imagines her arming slaves, rousing the army, appealing to Senate and people with evidence of the shipwreck, her wound, and dead friends. In desperation, he wakes Burrus and Seneca (Tacitus carefully notes uncertainty about their prior knowledge). Their long silence speaks volumes—whether from futility of dissuasion or recognition that it's kill or be killed. Seneca breaks silence, asking Burrus if the Praetorian Guard will execute Agrippina. Burrus refuses: the Guard are loyal to all Caesars and remember Germanicus too fondly to kill his daughter. Anicetus eagerly volunteers to finish the job. Nero's relief is palpable—he declares this the day he truly receives empire, grotesquely crediting a freedman. When Agerinus arrives with Agrippina's message, Nero stages a false assassination attempt: dropping a sword at the messenger's feet, having him arrested as if caught attempting regicide. The fabricated story: Agrippina sent an assassin, then killed herself in shame when the plot failed.
Key Themes & Ideas
- Panic as Revelation: Nero's terror reveals his guilt—innocent sons don't panic when mothers survive accidents.
- Imagination of Revenge: His fevered mind conjures multiple scenarios of Agrippina's retaliation—each more terrifying.
- Complicit Silence: Burrus and Seneca's long silence suggests they understand the situation perfectly.
- Institutional Loyalty: The Praetorian Guard's loyalty to dynastic memory (Germanicus) trumps current emperor's orders.
- Freedman as Saviour: A former slave becomes the emperor's deliverer—social inversion at its most extreme.
- Staged Justice: The false assassination scene shows how power manufactures its own truth.
Tacitean Technique
- Reported Speech: "Adfertur" (it is reported) maintains narrative distance while building tension.
- Tricolon of Terror: Three scenarios of revenge (slaves/soldiers/Senate) show comprehensive panic.
- Historic Present: "Parat" and other presents make the false staging immediate and vivid.
- Deliberate Ambiguity: "Incertum an et ante gnaros" refuses to clarify advisers' prior knowledge.
- Theatrical Metaphor: "Scaenam criminis" explicitly identifies the staged nature of false evidence.
- Ironic Elevation: Nero's declaration about receiving empire from a freedman inverts all Roman values.
Historical Context
The Praetorian Guard's loyalty to Germanicus reflects historical reality—he was beloved by the military, and his children (including Agrippina) inherited that devotion. The Guard's oath was to the imperial family collectively, not just the current emperor. Burrus, as Praetorian Prefect, knew his men wouldn't obey an order to kill Germanicus's daughter. The staging of false evidence was a Roman political tradition—planted weapons "proved" assassination attempts. The speed of events suggests everything happened within hours—Roman communications and travel times made rapid response essential. Freedmen like Anicetus often did emperors' dirty work, being both dependent on imperial favour and expendable if caught. The reference to Senate and people reflects the dual sources of legitimate power in Roman ideology, though by Nero's time both were largely ceremonial.
Questions to Consider
- What does Nero's panic reveal about his understanding of his mother's capabilities and resources?
- How does the advisers' silence function as a form of communication—what are they not saying?
- Why does Tacitus maintain ambiguity about whether Burrus and Seneca knew of the plot beforehand?
- What does the Praetorian Guard's loyalty to Germanicus's memory say about legitimacy versus power?
- How does Nero's gratitude to a freedman represent the ultimate perversion of Roman social hierarchy?
- What does the staged "assassination attempt" reveal about how autocratic power creates its own reality?