Why Book 24 Is the Heart of the Iliad
Book 24 is where the Iliad ENDS—not with Troy's fall, not with Achilles' death, not with Greek triumph, but with TWO OLD MEN weeping together in a tent at night. An elderly king travels alone through enemy lines to beg the man who killed his son for the corpse back. And that man—Achilles, the monster who dragged Hector's body for eleven days, who threatened to eat him raw—WEEPS with him and gives it back.
This ending shouldn't work. These are ENEMIES. Achilles murdered Hector in front of all Troy. Priam is the king of the city Achilles is trying to destroy. Achilles has spent eleven days ritually desecrating Hector's body every single morning. But for one night, in that tent, they're just two human beings who understand grief, mortality, and loss. And that's how Homer CHOOSES to end the greatest war poem ever written.
What Makes Book 24 Devastating
- Eleven days of ritual desecration: Every single morning Achilles drags Hector's corpse three times around Patroclus' tomb—obsessive, mechanical, endless
- Apollo preserves the body: Despite the abuse, Hector's corpse stays perfect—divine protection as divine JUDGEMENT of Achilles' behaviour
- The gods force intervention: Apollo condemns Achilles publicly; Zeus commands BOTH Achilles and Priam to act
- Priam's impossible courage: An elderly man enters the enemy camp ALONE at night, guided only by a god in disguise
- The kiss: Priam kisses "the terrible, man-slaughtering hands which had killed many of his sons"—physical contact with his children's killer
- Achilles' transformation: From threatening to eat Hector raw (Book 22) to gently returning the washed, anointed body
- Shared tears: Killer and victim's father weep together for Hector, Patroclus, and Peleus—recognising their common suffering
- The philosophy of suffering: Achilles' speech about the two jars—all mortals suffer, gods don't, there's no justice, only endurance
- The sacred meal: They eat together—xenia (guest-friendship) creating a bond that transcends enmity
- Mutual admiration: "They had taken their fill of gazing at one another"—recognising each other's worth despite everything
- Three laments: Andromache (widow), Hecuba (mother), Helen (friend)—each mourns Hector from a different perspective, showing the WHOLE man
- The final line: "Such was the funeral they held for Hector, tamer of horses"—a Trojan hero honoured, not Greek victory celebrated
The Power of the Ending
Homer COULD have ended with Hector's death in Book 22. That's the CLIMAX—the dramatic peak where Achilles achieves his vengeance. Or he could have shown Troy's fall, the Trojan Horse, Achilles' death, Odysseus' return. His audience KNEW these stories intimately. They were part of the broader Troy myth cycle. But Homer deliberately chooses to end with RECONCILIATION rather than victory, with BURIAL rather than battle, with SHARED HUMANITY rather than martial triumph.
Ring Composition: Book 1 ↔ Book 24
- Book 1: Chryses (priest, father) comes begging for his daughter Chryseis—Agamemnon refuses brutally, with contempt and threats
- Book 24: Priam (king, father) comes begging for his son Hector—Achilles accepts graciously, with tears and compassion
- Book 1: Apollo's plague punishes the Greeks—mass funeral pyres, anonymous dead, communal suffering
- Book 24: Hector's individual funeral pyre—one hero properly honoured, personal grief acknowledged
- Book 1: Achilles withdraws from battle in RAGE—"the wrath of Achilles" begins the poem, driving all the tragedy
- Book 24: Achilles' rage ENDS in compassion—the wrath resolved through shared humanity, understanding mortality
- Book 1: Agamemnon treats Chryses "like a worthless vagrant"—public humiliation, contempt for suppliants
- Book 24: Achilles treats Priam with respect and honour—acknowledging his nobility despite being enemies
The parallel with Book 1 is DELIBERATE and PROFOUND. The Iliad is structurally a CIRCLE—we return to where we started (a father begging for his child), but EVERYTHING has changed. The supplication that failed catastrophically in Book 1 succeeds movingly in Book 24. Achilles—who was so consumed by rage that he prayed for Greek deaths—has learned something about compassion, about mortality, about what actually matters when facing death.
✨ The Moment That Defines the Epic
When Priam enters Achilles' tent and clasps his knees, two worlds collide: Greek and Trojan, youth and age, killer and victim's father, warrior and king, vengeance and mercy. The fact that THIS moment—not military victory, not heroic glory, not the sack of Troy, not Achilles' death—is how Homer chooses to end the Iliad tells us what the poem is REALLY about: the human cost of war, the universality of grief, and the fragile but real possibility of compassion even between worst enemies.
What Homer DOESN'T Show Us
Notice what's MISSING from the Iliad's ending. Homer's audience knew these stories, but he chooses NOT to include them:
Famous Events NOT in the Iliad
- The Trojan Horse
- Troy's fall and sack
- Achilles' death (arrow in the heel)
- Paris' death
- Priam's murder at the altar
- Astyanax thrown from the walls
- Andromache enslaved
- Odysseus' journey home
What Homer DOES Show
- Father's love transcending hatred
- Enemies recognising shared humanity
- Proper burial rites honoured
- Compassion breaking through rage
- Trojan hero honoured by Greeks
- Temporary truce allowing mourning
- Hope for mercy even in war
- Poem ends with funeral, not triumph
💡 Why End With Hector's Funeral?
Homer ends with reconciliation rather than victory because that's what the poem is ABOUT. It's not about WHO WINS. It's about the COST of war—what violence does to human beings, how grief transforms us, whether compassion is possible amongst enemies. Ending with Troy's fall would be triumphalist. Ending with Hector's funeral is tragic. The Iliad mourns war even as it depicts it.