Explain how far you think Achilles is shown to be admirable in this passage.
The Passage
Try identifying techniques yourself first, then click to reveal
Try writing your own answer first, then compare with this model response
Model Answer
A strong 10-mark answer should make 5 separate references to the text, explaining how far Homer presents Achilles as admirable. This question requires evaluation - discussing both admirable and unadmirable qualities.
Point 1: Brave but savage (balanced evaluation)
Achilles shows traditional heroic courage when he 'sprang to meet' Hector, suggesting he is unafraid and eager for combat. The active verb 'sprang' presents him as bold and confident, which are admirable warrior qualities. However, this courage is undermined by the description that his heart was 'filled with savage determination'. The adjective 'savage' suggests animal-like brutality rather than noble purpose, making him seem excessive and cruel. The phrase 'murder in his heart' further damages his admirability - the noun 'murder' implies premeditated malice rather than honourable warfare. Therefore, whilst Achilles displays bravery, his excessive violence makes him only partially admirable.
Point 2: Divinely favoured and visually glorious
Homer makes Achilles admirable through references to divine favour and visual splendour. His armour was made by Hephaestus who 'had lavished' care on the crest, showing that the gods value him and have equipped him specially. This divine connection elevates Achilles above ordinary mortals. The epic simile comparing his spear to 'Hesperus, the loveliest star set in the skies' creates an image of brilliance and beauty. The emphasis on aesthetic glory ('glittering helmet', 'lovely plumes') makes Achilles seem magnificent and exceptional. These techniques present him as admirable through his god-given superiority and visual splendour, though this could be seen as superficial compared to moral qualities.
Point 3: Skilled but calculating
Achilles demonstrates impressive warrior skill when he is described 'searching that handsome body for its most vulnerable spot'. This tactical approach shows him as expert and competent, which is admirable in a warrior. His ability to identify and strike the exact weak point in Hector's armour (the throat) demonstrates mastery of his craft. However, this calculated search for weakness could also seem cold and ruthless. Rather than meeting Hector in a fair contest, Achilles deliberately hunts for an advantage, which might be seen as lacking in honour. Therefore, his skill is admirable from a practical perspective but potentially less so from a moral one.
Point 4: Godlike status vs ungodlike behaviour
The repeated epithet 'godlike Achilles' (used twice) continually elevates him and suggests exceptional status worthy of admiration. This traditional Homeric epithet associates him with the divine and marks him as outstanding among men. However, there is irony in calling him 'godlike' immediately after he gloats over his dying enemy. When Hector 'crashed in the dust', the undignified collapse creates pathos for the victim. Achilles' response - mocking Hector with 'no doubt you imagined... that you would be safe' - is cruel and vindictive. This gloating over a dying man contradicts the supposed 'godlike' nobility, making the epithet seem ironic and reducing his admirability significantly.
Point 5: Context of revenge
The reference to Patroclus in Achilles' final speech provides context for his behaviour. Hector had killed and stripped Patroclus, which motivates Achilles' vengeance. From this perspective, Achilles' violence could be seen as justified retribution for his beloved companion's death, making him more admirable as someone who honours his fallen friend. The detail that Hector wears 'the fine bronze armour he had taken from great Patroclus' emphasises the personal nature of this conflict. However, even with this justification, the extent of Achilles' cruelty - the 'savage' determination, the calculated killing, and the vindictive gloating - seems excessive. Therefore, whilst the revenge context makes Achilles' behaviour more understandable, it does not make it fully admirable. Overall, Homer presents a complex picture where Achilles has admirable qualities (courage, skill, divine favour) but his excessive violence and cruel behaviour significantly limit how far he can be considered truly admirable.